Masafumi Koba

Results 705 comments of Masafumi Koba

@SaekiTominaga Thanks for the proposal. This idea sounds good to me. 👍🏼 Before starting a new rule, we must clearly define "unconstrained `:has()`". We're seeing the following patterns now: -...

Thanks for providing the examples. We can see more complex cases like `:is(.bar *):has(.foo)` in the [tests](https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev/blob/4582d908c17fbf7924f5699609fe4a12c28ddc4a/layout/inspector/tests/chrome/test_getSelectorWarnings.html#L23-L42). It seems easier to start with simple cases.

@Mouvedia Thanks for the issue. To help us understand the issue, I've created a minimum [demo](https://stylelint.io/demo/#N4Igxg9gJgpiBcICGACYAdAdilBaAtgM64CWmALjAE4AOEANkuSRJgdDPCgEYlgCuvMAG4sOXAHcY3ANYlyubkjAyA5lQj9MUXIRIAvTigCMNAB6jMAXxAAaEADMS9GADkk+OIhhmPNFwB0YISEduCsTqoIIBjYKOggVPwuhAlcsTg4CTQaNNTkAJ64mBC4AG4w2hBUuDkwTmZpKORJMGIoVlg29pCYkQBi1fhM0QBWhKxhsDShiBnxIISFLvRk5E0JADzGAOwBAAwHCV0gVkA): ```css a { -ms-interpolation-mode: bicubic; -webkit-background-size: 1px; } /* ↓ autofixed ↓ */ a...

I see. Then, can we consider a *false positive* for `background-size`, not a breaking change?

Okay. Let's address this issue for v17. 👍🏼

@Mouvedia Thanks for the info. Considering conditions to re-enable autofix sounds reasonable. 👍🏼 @romainmenke Can you please hear your thoughts if you have any?

@damiansire Thanks for the report. I've transferred this issue to the website repository.

Here is the current algolia config: https://github.com/stylelint/stylelint.io/blob/eaa0978250a275c6d4ac71e137338bf7c016a65c/docusaurus.config.js#L77-L81

I've updated the Algolia index configuration according to the following docs: - https://docsearch.algolia.com/docs/templates/#docusaurus-v2--v3-template - https://docusaurus.io/docs/search#algolia-index-configuration I added `lvl0` to the index config: Then, the suggestions increased, but `undefined` still remains:...

Yeah, we need a reproduction to investigate the problem. Please consider providing it. 🙏🏼 --- I'm not 100% sure, but I doubt this line cannot raise the error because `configForFile?.config`...