Robert Kaussow
Robert Kaussow
Understood, thanks. I would prefer a DB-level locking mechanism but Im also still fine with the current approach.
Yes @lafriks and I had objections. Id still prefere a DB level fix. Ill try to look into it, otherwise Im fine with the current approach for now.
Yeah I know. Will you create a PR then?
I would agree at least to some changes. Some of the logs e.g. `failed to parse yaml` should also be covered by the linter and show up in the UI...
Can you add a bit more context about what has changed and how it fixes the linked issue? IMO it helps to provide a more detailed PR description in addition...
Thank you! ❤️
Will finally take a look this evening.
After switching to this branch I get 
 I would stick to a two line layout, even if the second line would be empty. The pipeline id is not show for me.
> I'm not sure if I'd do this. True. But I would prefer to not change the layout depending on the event. Ill try to find another approach if not...