Robert Kaussow
Robert Kaussow
Yes, please... if we dont want to have more options in woodpecker core (I still dont understand why) please provide an http interface like drone ci does so users can...
> There should be an option to not require approval from forks as this would be quite problematic for company internal instances imho Fully agree. Otherwise, this PR is also...
Looks like you broke the tests now
I'm confused about the milestone. Is this one targeted for v3 now or 2.8? And if the target for v3 is correct, why is there a `backport-required` label also present?...
> please backport :) This is IMO pretty bad practice. If we merge the PR from someone else, we can't expect that the other one will be able to create...
@6543 See discussion in https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/pull/3348#discussion_r1826043277 Migrating a public, not gated repo to RequiredForkApproval is by definition a breaking change as it changes the behavior for users. Yes, you can argue...
@anbraten what was the reason to switch from `Exited` to `Finished` here?
@henkka can you check the failing linter?
Why do we even calculate the pipeline number manually? Cant we simply use an auto-increment table field?
@henkka Linting and db tests still failing.