Anton Zinovyev
Anton Zinovyev
Yeah, as I outlined in #123 - I'm planning to implement such thing. But currently it looks like nightmare to implement. Though, Im not given up on this idea yet)
As 3 attempts passed to implement this feature - I'm ready to give up on it. It is infinitely hard to track all accesses to structures fields, especially giving that...
Kind of.. Because all this breaks with understanding that definition can be inside other definition (and so on until you bored🙃) and this exact issue is the most bothering one....
@dependabot recreate
We're already two versions behind React, and the recent release of React 19 has pushed the testing library into a situation where they now need to introduce a built-in harness...
Thanks for contribution!
@dependabot recreate
What I'm planning to do: - **`allowEmpty: bool`** - allows empty structures everywhere. - **`allowEmptyRx: []srting`** - allows empty structures that match any of provided regexes. - **`allowEmptyReturns: bool`** -...
Reopening since not all of planned features implemented yet
@stephanos unfortunately not. For the reason that if we will start to bind for specific packages it open the gates for infinite requests to support of other packages. Furthermore it...