Jordi Puiggené

Thanks @Lunga001 for reporting. Addressed with #2470.

Thanks for reporting @conroyke56. This is a bug that we introduced yesterday with https://github.com/senaite/senaite.core/pull/2471 . I've opened a Pull Request that addresses this issue: https://github.com/senaite/senaite.app.supermodel/pull/19

The Doctor should only be able to see the Patients from the same Client to which he/she is assigned. A Doctor can provide services for more than one client. Hence,...

@siyamalan which template are you using? Seems that Publication specification is taken into consideration in Default + MultiDefault templates already: https://github.com/senaite/senaite.impress/blob/master/src/senaite/impress/templates/reports/Default.pt#L268 and https://github.com/senaite/senaite.impress/blob/master/src/senaite/impress/templates/reports/MultiDefault.pt#L277

Funny. So with [this change you've done](https://github.com/siyamalan/senaite.core/commit/e027647b879f20b4f70c26e56aac111a79cb3140#diff-9d57b6da936ef609e76f1d66d7886474R1934) , the analyses keep their own specs (e.g. defined on Sample creation), but the publication specs are displayed in the report. Nevertheless, keep...

Some comments: - The unique identifier can already be achieved using the idserver. At the moment, there is no specific configuration for sample attachments (so their ids look similar to...

See https://github.com/senaite/senaite.health/issues/96#issuecomment-405169208

These patient-specific fields in rejection report (pdf) were coded in senaite.core rather than in senaite.health a long time ago. See https://github.com/senaite/senaite.core/pull/857 These changes need to be ported to health, requiring...