Wouter Termont

On the most urgent matter of the WebID/ClientID Document format, we have a few options: - Have the WebID spec change it to JSON-LD by default. - Have the Solid-OIDC...

@acoburn Thanks for the short recap for people who want to follow, but I don't see where we are conflating things. > WebIDs can and are used to identify applications....

@elf-pavlik, personally I'm not a big fan of putting claims under a 'solid' object. Also, if we use the federation entity statements, the clientid can just remain the app's WebID...

Some considerations in light of the discussion during the CG Weekly. --- ### About the issue There seems to be a huge amount of misunderstanding in this discussion, exemplified by...

@RubenVerborgh, we're only going in circles because people get stuck on the same misinterpretation of this issue as @acoburn and @bblfish, which both I and @elf-pavlik have tried to [clear...

> indeed it was considered by @acoburn quite early on, since he was arguing to allow WebIDs to have turtle representations for just that reason https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/3 . Exactly 😄 That's...

Some other possible templates: - implementation questions: what is the context/setup, what is the question, what has already been done to find an answer (where was the answer expected) ......

> Yes, it can have a link, see for example: https://github.com/solid/authorization-panel/issues/new/choose This is just perfect design; makes me happy 😊

While I do agree with @kjetilk in #399 that we should refrain ourselves from all too eagerly providing special affordances to specific forms of knowledge organization, I find the proposal...

@rubensworks, as you already [mentioned](https://github.com/solid/specification/issues/463#issuecomment-1272353638) in, the long discussion in https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/3 can already give us a lot of insight in people's preferences/goals having to do with serialisations. I try to...