Wouter Termont

@ykazakov just the same error as mentioned in the issues, does that make sense?

> @woutermont from which of the two branches did you build Protege? Ah, damn, again, my bad ... correct branch indeed gives the java.xml.bind error. Similar for the [other](https://github.com/wismill/protege) solution...

@ykazakov that seems to work! I'll work a bit with it and report any problems ...

W.r.t. #942, any update on your progress, @ericprud? Thanks!

I would hope not, since this WebID-OIDC repo contains _a lot_ more info on the authentication flow than the Solid-OIDC spec does. _To me_, it seems as though the latter...

@RubenVerborgh, if something still bothers you about this, could you try to explain it once more? A few days ago I thought I was following, but I'm no longer sure...

Since those paraphrases can contain errors, and only make sense when combined with a reference anyway, the best way to ensure a robust foundation would actually be to refer to...

@csarven, I might have used some rhetorical hyperbole, the term 'useless' should probably have been more in the lines of 'redundant', and once more our keenness for abstraction seems to...

It perplexes me that in some discussions we make a big deal of keeping complexity at a minimum for users and app developers, while in others (like here) we neglect...

Well, then you are a perfect example of why we should NOT mandate both authz mechanisms to be supported by each client. I believe the only way forward is to...