Wouter Termont

@jeswr > > So > :p :o :g is a triple in :g about a triple in the default graph > > I disagree - here `>` is just a...

> At least with null, however, it is clear that a quoted triple is different from asserted triple. Otherwise, I fear that it will be easy to make that mistake...

@tpluscode, the other 2/3 of my comment did address the 'merit' of [your example](https://github.com/rdfjs/types/issues/34#issuecomment-1330532386). My conclusion just was that there is nothing special going on there except some programmer error....

> I think you actually introduce yet another option, which is not the same as any of those proposed by @jeswr. My bad for being so ambiguous: my option numbers...

Just for clarity: I actually think I your suggestion (Option 1 but typed instead of null-valued) is the cleanest solution after mine. I am 100% sure though that in that...

Thanks for giving your clarifying interpretation of the square analogy, @tpluscode, but it is mathematically simply not correct to say that the 2 in that example is only syntactically a...

Alright, I see the complexity and will look into existing possibilities :)