W. Trevor King

> Please contribute to master branch. I can rebase onto master and change the target branch without filing a new PR and fragmenting discussion. Can you re-open this PR so...

Redirected the PR and rebased onto master with d8f9c62 → b8d8357.

> .. generate related tests are all failed... They [look like they passed to me][1]. Can you link to what you'd like fixed? [1]: https://travis-ci.org/opencontainers/runtime-tools/builds/255352369

Ah, I probably need to rebase around #431.

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:04:30AM +0000, W. Trevor King wrote: > Ah, I probably need to rebase around #431. I've done this and addressed the missing brace [1]...

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 04:51:57AM -0700, 梁辰晔 (Liang Chenye) wrote: > The result is quite positive and looks good: > https://travis-ci.org/liangchenye/runc/builds/135002152 Heh, I think that means we have...

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 12:04:45AM -0700, 梁辰晔 (Liang Chenye) wrote: > I hope every runtime could follow oci spec and use ocitools to > verify that. I checked...

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:08:16AM -0700, Chris Aniszczyk wrote: > Initial discussions are around having three levels of certification: > - OCI Runtime Ready (runtime-spec only) > -...

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:11:56AM -0700, Chris Aniszczyk wrote: > @wking can you expand a bit on, not sure what you mean by "valid consumer" ‘ocitools validate’ [1](https://github.com/opencontainers/ocitools/blob/master/man/ocitools-validate.1.md)...

Cross linking upstream improvements in this area, there is work on clarifying the container side of `terminal` in opencontainers/runtime-spec#518, and after that lands there are plans to address the host...