William Cheng

thanks for the PR cc @jaumard (2018/09) @josh-burton (2019/12) @amondnet (2019/12) @sbu-WBT (2020/12) @kuhnroyal (2020/12) @agilob (2020/12) @ahmednfwela (2021/08)

@jasperpatterson thanks for the PR what if the baseName contains special characters (e.g. modified-date), would it still work? in other client generators, there are mappings between object property name (`name`)...

Thanks for the PR but your commit (as shown in the Commits tab) is not linked to your Github account, which means this PR won't count as your contribution in...

Please use spaces intead of tab. Also can you share a spec to reproduce the issue?

> The idea behind this modification was to copy the "model-name-suffix" feature. But I agree that it might not fit for every generator. Given that it's only targeting a specified...

@vfpfafrf thanks for the PR. I noticed that you've changed some methods from public/protected to private. Can we keep those as public/protected as there are use cases in which the...

> May be it should be interface with abstract and default generator implementations ? Yes, I think that's better as the same Example Generator cannot meet the syntax requirement of...

@stevecookform3 I think that's because you're defining the model inline and swagger codegen will try to generate only 1 model if both inline models appear to be the same. You...

Something like this: ``` attributes: title: NewNameHere type: object properties: name: type: string ``` I would recommend defining the model separately instead of inline.

Understood that different developers have different preferences on how to define models. What about disabling the behaviour if the "title" attribute is present?