Sebastian Wilzbach

> I don't agree that the docs should explicitly legalize mutating the AA while iterating over it. @ all thanks a lot for your very active discussion and feedback. I...

> Why was it disabled? I think because we moved the testsuite to DAutoTest to keep the CI overhead low here. > I don't know if it's going to bring...

> I am opposed to this solely because it further complicates the build process. It needs to have a strong justification for the additional complication. Well, the idea is to...

> cc @RazvanN7 this is the kind of stuff we need to enable with the parser as a library. @RazvanN7 yes the libdparse API is pretty sweet. In case you...

@andralex @WalterBright we still depend on the high-level decision whether we want to go into this direction.

> @andralex @WalterBright we still depend on the high-level decision whether we want to go into this direction. Seeing that the updating the spec manually is tedious work that often...

> just to keep in sync a few names that are seldom updated. Hehe it still happens to get out of sync regularly, e.g. https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/pull/1683 And where is `isDeprecated`? https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7178...

Note that without this PR we can't get rid of the now duplicate implementation of `move,{Emplace}` in Phobos as there are tests for the `doesPointTo` check. See also: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/6848

Could you try the newly released 0.9.0 version of vibe.d to see whether the issue still persists?

Probably also fixed by PR https://github.com/dlang-community/D-Scanner/pull/394