Wesley Wigham
Wesley Wigham
@typescript-bot perf test this faster
@typescript-bot perf test this faster
@typescript-bot perf test this faster
I mentioned it in our meeting, but the only things not `noCheck`-flagged (aside from change the format of the API function from "get flags" to "has flag") at this point...
FWIW, I don't think computed property names are compatible with `isolatedDeclarations` _at a fundamental level_ - wherever we land on the fix is going to be a compromise. Computed names...
> There is no semantic issue here as far as I can tell, it's just something that is needed to achieve token level equality of the output. ish? The ID...
These are all errors for now, but as we allow some of these forms as special cases, we do want to think about possibly aligning the emit output where possible,...
> On a related node. Why is renaming of shadowed parameters needed in this case? It's a bit more pessimistic than it strictly has to be sometimes, but the renaming...
Hm. We didn't allow get/set in types for a looong time, and only added it to support differing getter/setter type pairs - and to avoid accidentally breaking backcompat for people,...
> Does this need to wait for https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/58364 given the ts-nocheck files may be emitting js? Either that or, like the other PR, only enabled when only `.d.ts` emit is...