Bill Duncan

IIRC, there was push back on using Aristotelian definitions on an RO call a while back. The person (sorry I can't recall her name) said that the curators couldn't understand...

Added citation for the OHD. https://github.com/OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/pull/2102

I have the same problem, even after install `apsw`.

@lewismc What is the URL of your SPARQL endpoint?

Here's an example [result](http://cor.esipfed.org/ont/sparql#query=PREFIX+owl%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F07%2Fowl%23%3E%0APREFIX+rdf%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F1999%2F02%2F22-rdf-syntax-ns%23%3E%0APREFIX+rdfs%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2F01%2Frdf-schema%23%3E%0ASELECT+%3Fclass+%3Fclass_label+(count(distinct+%3Fi)+as+%3Finstance_count)+WHERE+%7B%0A++%3Fclass+a+owl%3AClass.%0A++optional+%7B%0A++++%3Fclass+rdfs%3Alabel+%3Fclass_label%0A++%7D+.%0A++optional+%7B%0A++++%3Fchild+rdfs%3AsubClassOf+%3Fclass%0A++%7D+.%0A++%3Fi+a+%3Fclass%3B%0A+++++a+owl%3ANamedIndividual+.%0A++filter(!bound(%3Fchild))+%23+only+return+the+leaf+classes%0A++%23+filter(!isblank(%3Fi))%0A%7D+%0Agroup+by+%3Fclass+%3Fclass_label%0Aorder+by+desc(%3Finstance_count)%0A%23+LIMIT+10&contentTypeConstruct=application%2Frdf%2Bxml&contentTypeSelect=application%2Fsparql-results%2Bjson&endpoint=http%3A%2F%2Fcor.esipfed.org%2Fsparql&requestMethod=POST&tabTitle=Query&headers=%7B%7D&outputFormat=table) Looks you have a lot of dams :)

EnvO doesn't have terms for expressing geologic age ... perhaps this could be an area of collaboration that would benefit EnvO. My main thought was to enrich SWEET by using...

As far I can tell SWEET doesn't have strong semantics. In any case, you can classify individuals multiple ways. The goal is to enrich semantic search. You can do this...

On the EnvO slack channel (anyone a part of this?) the suggestion was made to map (e.g., skos:closematch) geologic ages to the wikidata IRIs. I'm not familiar enough with wikidata...

FWIW, I think it is helpful that glosses get separated out. It makes them queryable, and you can have more than one gloss. This is in contrast to definitions in...

@matentzn I share your skepticism, which is why I added my comment: > FWIW, I think DWC:depth should be mapped as a skos:exactMatch to MIXS:depth. The differing value syntax is...