Bill Duncan

@KrishnaTO So, far I am only seeing very general examples about how some hypothetical measurement protocol is related to some hypothetical group of characteristics. It would be great if you...

@ddooley Thanks for pointing me to the AgrO screen shots :) Sorry, if my previous comment was not clear. Hopefully, this helps ... Using the mulch thickness example, here is...

@ddooley > As I understand it the way you link characteristics to a process is by way of recently introduced "regulates characteristic" rather than 'has input' some characteristic. The `regulates...

> Side note, OBI has your ":mp :has-participant :mulch-thickness-protocol" structured as ":mp executes (':plan specification' and 'has part' :mulch-thickness-protocol)" I was not aware that the `executes` relation had made its...

@ddooley yes names are a pain :( Does `measurement protocol` need be in the name, or can we short just `protocol`? If so (to build of your examples), how about...

One last suggestion (hopefully). I think it may be advantageous to generalize the relation to: - `about measurement of characteristic` - domain: `generically dependent continuant` - range: `characteristic` This still...

@KrishnaTO @ddooley Please the definition I created for `is about measurement of characteristic` in PR https://github.com/oborel/obo-relations/pull/655. ``` x is about measurement of characteristic y means that - x is an...

@jamesaoverton Based on the discussion so far, the request was for relating protocols to characteristics. The intervening process is mentioned in the proposed definition for `is about measurement of characteristic`....

Yes. it can be reopened. But, do you have any suggestion on how to move forward?

Sorry. I wasn't clear. Do you have a definition to propose?