Wayne Beaton

> I created [IPLab issue 3760](https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/emo-team/iplab/-/issues/3760) to review the content. There's some additional discussion on the IP issue for consideration. Based on the lack of response there, I'm assuming that...

> Edit: Forgot to ask, update the license in what sense? Ask Saxon to consider moving to the EPL-2.0 license or something else? What would be best to update to?...

Before you get too excited, the response that suggests that you can avoid the GPL "linking problem" by using Maven does not match the Eclipse Foundation's interpretation of the license...

> So with Michael's response, what would be the best next step to take? With apologies for the glib response... get used to disappointment. Or this: > Maybe an alternative...

> I am seeing many examples of Red Hat employees that we are on-boarding into Adoptium that have indicated in their profile that they work for Red Hat, but they...

The summary files are dated February 2024. AFAICT, the build is failing while trying to resolve a dependency. https://github.com/eclipse-pdt/pdt/actions/runs/9210361818/job/25337188139#step:11:51

> Correct url with recent error: https://github.com/eclipse-pdt/pdt/actions/runs/8052422043/job/21992505636 The date is Feb 26.  When we retired the Eclipse PTP project, the ability to automatically associating its contents with the project...

The Dash License Tool is not in Maven Central. Either you need to install it locally, or you must include the `pluginRepository` as described in the [documentation](https://github.com/eclipse/dash-licenses#add-to-your-maven-build). ``` dash-licenses-snapshots https://repo.eclipse.org/content/repositories/dash-licenses-snapshots/...

> I don't know the details @waynebeaton maybe can tell or we need a servicedesk ticket to clarify what / when is checked... Both contributors appear to have signed the...

+1