Wayne Beaton

Confirmed.

> I guess we can consider a git submodule as a ["Prerequisites"](https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#ip-prereq) ? +1 Including third party content as a submodule certainly sounds like a prerequisite relationship. The challenge with...

Open an issue against [Eclipse Help Desk](https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/issues) and the IT team will help you sort it out. They're the permissions experts. FWIW, even with automatic detection of vulnerabilities and pull...

> Let's forget exceptions for a moment: if you "detect" `License-1` and `License-2`, how do you know whether the correct expression is `License-1 OR License-2` or `License-1 AND License-2` ?...

Note that if this is the product of the Eclipse project (i.e. it doesn't contain any extra intellectual property developed outside of the scope of the open source project), then...

Both sound fine to me. Please do note, however, that I am unfamiliar with the OpenAPI trademark usage guidelines (in my experience, the "... for xyz" is a commonly permitted...

I'm grateful that you're thinking this through, but you may be overthinking a bit. > Project committers and leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments,...

Sorry, I don't monitor that repository's inbox. As I stated previously, my preference is that we not start creating minor variations of the code of conduct unless absolutely necessary. I...

The specification project needs to be independent of any particular implementation. Other than that, I don't care. We discussed the organization of projects in a different thread. The short version...

Updating to the EPL-2.0 would result in the same sort of dual licensing that you're doing with the EPL-1.0 now, just with the newer version of the license. > EPL...