Wang Fenjin

Same here

Hi @shafreeck , Thanks for your great work! Do we have any schedule on this?

Thanks for the report. I did a quick check, one of the main reason is arrow crate takes too much time to build. It may not easy to optimize this,...

Asked in https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/2170

@Michael-F-Bryan If you are using bundled version, you may also need pay attention to this. It related to the [ignored tests](https://github.com/wangfenjin/duckdb-rs/blob/main/src/statement.rs#L627)

@danbruder Are you still working on this? We can wait for https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/pull/3405 which will fix your issue, but this MR is also necessary if we want to append using Time...

According to the issue you mentioned, they had support append datachunks - test example: https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/blob/f44e77c7ec356ca6aee96dc84b0e00a6d3c6973a/test/api/capi/test_capi_data_chunk.cpp#L51 - doc: https://duckdb.org/docs/api/c/data_chunk We need to add API in [appender.rs](https://github.com/wangfenjin/duckdb-rs/blob/main/src/appender.rs) . I maintain this crate...

If the inmemory data is arrow format, we may also choose to add api for table functions - https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/blob/f44e77c7ec/src/function/table/arrow.cpp#L1111 - https://duckdb.org/docs/api/c/table_functions - https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/blob/5079e8e7f05057b10e97d0dd028a3e1d636c798b/src/include/duckdb.h#L1330

Yes, you are free to create a new file for this

Hi @danbruder , thanks for the report! The root cause is currently we don't support bind timestamp param. It will not be an easy fix, but I'll give you some...