Peter Wagenet

@bendemboski Alright, this is now considered "Exploring" which, in new RFC stages, means that we're actively interested in. I think this looks pretty solid but I'm sure others will have...

After discussion in the RFC Review Meeting we decided to move this to Final Comment Period.

@ef4 I'm agreed that we definitely do not want to leak ember-cli internals!

When we merge, we'll have to manually trigger the advancement PR since this one affects two RFC files.

Thanks for your work here! This will be addressed as part of #832.

Given the fact that this is not aligned with our current direction we are moving to FCP to Close.

Thanks for spending the time writing this RFC! Given the significant number of concerns around routing, we’re going to be completely revamping the router as part of Polaris. This RFC...

It seems to me that it's unlikely that this will be the actual primitive we want long term. The existing polyfill allows for experimentation in this area so I think...

We had some back and forth in the Review meeting today around whether this should move to Exploring or not. There's definitely agreement that this is a problem we need...

All the specs do pass. You should just have to `bundle install` and `bundle exec rspec spec`. So tests would still be appreciated.