Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel
Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel
The only problem is that changing this would not be strictly an editorial change, I am afraid. El 05/03/2018 a las 14:46, Michael Steidl escribió: > > The section aboutRule...
@besteves4 any news here? Should we close this issue?
This was pointed out by others, as well. I support the idea. Would anybody oppose?
I believe this clarification is necessary, for the discussion between "refinement" and "constraints" regularly appear; and I do appreciate the comments by @simonstey but still... what is the specific example...
I dare to label the issue as ODRL3.0 and invite participants to provide feedback on Rui's work. 
I add @besteves4, for she volunteers to create a spreadsheet with all the terms that have been discussed.
We have still 7 open issues. I see the errata are still there...
As per the guidelines at https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/errata/, > The community discusses the issue. If it is accepted as a genuine erratum, the label “Errata” is added to the entry I suggest...
The representation of the state of the world implies having new elements in ODRL. I label this issue as "new feature".
Proposed resolution: the context is unlimited, infinite. Every new specified element should be backed by an example in the test bed. If there is no example in the test bed,...