Vít Ondruch

Yeah, I totally understand your point. Binary compatibility is an issue not only for Command-T, but monitoring ruby-core, there is steady inflow of this kind of issues. Nevertheless, I came...

well, as an administrator of my system, I see no problem with installing pik under %PROGRAMFILES% and that is for installed program the best place. I works just fine from...

BTW, plenty of other aplications install into the other folders, but it is wrong decision ... they have always different reasons and the one most common is that the cant...

So why do you install Rubies into ~/.pik then? You should install them by the pik. Why should be 7z exception? And again, you will be on safe side when...

Also remember this: ### 0.2.8 / 2010-06-22 *\* BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY CHANGE pik will now install new rubies to %USERPROFILE%\rubies\, instead of %PIK_BIN%\pik\ this was necessary to all for installation into...

You are right with the DevKit and XP. However DevKit and Rubies were installed under user profile with Pik 0.2.8 (at leas I don't remember any special action) ... It...

Hm, the CI is probably not configured :/

This resolves #66

I am not using Rake, since Rake is additional dependency and moreover it has tendency to bring in even more unnecessary dependencies, such as Hoe, etc.

I have nothing against using Rake for development purposes, but I am not running the test suite because I am developing. I am running the test suite, because I am...