Vicent Martí

Looks great! I figured the test was making wrong assumptions. Thanks again @arthurschreiber

Oy my bad, I completely overlooked this PR when I began working on https://github.com/vitessio/vitess/pull/15539 so there's an obvious conflict. That PR is now merged and the `arewefast` results are looking...

@systay OK here's a more-or-less working fix for this (which includes several related cleanups, particularly removing evalengine APIs which we don't need anymore). You'll see that some plans have changed:...

Fixing this bug was way more involved than we initially expected! The PR is green now and the planner changes have been reviewed with @systay. Basically, we were not properly...

Updated title and description with an actual list of changes for this PR. :sparkle:

@GrahamCampbell :point_up: what @systay said -- sorry I missed your question! The GitHub UI collapsed it. :sweat_smile:

Aye this is unrelated to any previous issue, and it's not blocking any users or customers afaict. The report was filed by @systay himself and he found the problem by...

Hey David, thanks for the suggestion! We've received a few tweets and comments regarding definition lists... You see, the main thing stopping us from implementing them in Upskirt is that...

Indeed, indeed, that would make things easier. However, GitHub is about social coding, and social coding means making cooperation easier between developers; standards, although sometimes a nuisance, make this happen,...

Nope, because definition lists support an arbitrary number of definitions for a single term. There's no way to parse that without backtracking. Either way, as a friendly reminder to everybody...