Valentin Balaschenko

> This PR essentially reverts commit [40cd573](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/commit/40cd57355db2f5367184a814367b3634505ab838), which I recently added due to comment: [#5270 (comment)](https://github.com/XRPLF/rippled/pull/5270#discussion_r2560543251) Ok. If the consensus is that `lsfMPTCanClawback` can be set without `lsfMPTCanLock`. Then we...

If I had to pick between Solution 1 and Solution 2, I’d still lean towards 2: it feels safer and faster to ship, while 1 is more of a long-term,...