Veljko Lipovac

Is it okay to resolve this issue together with #1244 ? For practical reasons of diverging code basis.

I know it's bad practice, but this one time it will help reduce the amount of refactoring, thanks!

@keileg this PR is now ready for review. The tests for tracer flow with 1 or 3 phases are fully set up. I am currently working on the L2-error test...

@keileg I added the final test for the linear tracer model in fractional flow formulation including a diffusive pressure equation (MPFA re-discretization). This PR is now complete and what remains...

@IvarStefansson I have reworked the tutorial according to your review, except your point about the reference to Upwind-coupling. I am not sure what to reference to, because Upwinding is explained...

Yes, that is important. The data extracted by `solver_statistics` could use a facelift in terms of flexibility how data is saved and stored, and when.

I suggest the following course of action - [x] 1. A workflow/action to ensure no folder `/docs/` is contained in a PR to develop - [x] 2. Another action asserting...

> @vlipovac Do I understand you correctly that point 3 is a one-time manual operation while the rest is automatized? If so, this sounds great. Yes, step 3 is a...

Put on hold for now, until documentation of the package is brought to an acceptable level and resources freed for committing to documentation maintenance. References for how to approach this:...

Oh my, alright. Is this issue then obsolete or duplicate? > This is basically numpy being to eager to broadcast its way of of everything, see https://stackoverflow.com/a/6129099 for an explanation...