Viktor Larsson

This should hopefully be resolved in 2.0.4.

Yes, Sorry about the delay. The reason is that I started working on some refactorization of the camera models (https://github.com/PoseLib/PoseLib/tree/camera_models), which would also include the division model. So the plan...

Nice catch. Indeed it should be the derivative w.r.t. r^2. A uniform rescaling of the weights should not change the optimization. It could potentially affect the numerics, or in the...

Hi Marcus, Yes I would definitely be interested in these solvers. I quickly looked through the code and I think it would only require minor modifications to integrate them. Such...

I saw your paper, nice work! It would be great if you could make a PR for this. Regarding the comment, there is currently a WIP branch that refactors the...

Regarding testing. If you want, you could also setup a PR for https://github.com/vlarsson/posebench that also tests the F estimators.

I would guess the focal length is normalised w.r.t. the scale computed here https://github.com/vlarsson/radialsfm/blob/bd849f5f13faf93bd8d6a8e4c406be98ccec5884/src/estimators/radial_absolute_pose.cc#L239-L243 Perhaps try f*scale. That said, in this framework we only use this function to get a...

Thanks for looking into it! I will see if I can set it up to compile on my M1. Did you figure out what the issue was linking with boost?

I would try bumping the pybind11 version to the latest. We had some weird interactions earlier that came from some numpy version.

Thinking more about it I think it would be best to avoid `undistort_with_jac`, mainly as it will be a pain to implement for all models. I've been working a bit...