Julien Viet

we should consider having a CI build for this. @cescoffier noticted it and the `PooledByteBufAllocator` has been moved to another class instead

can you try with latest master @jvican ?

I think we should define a way to handle optional dependencies in a way that it always work too. On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 8:30 AM Clement Escoffier ***@***.***>...

DynamicCertOptions would be the way to go I think, CertOptions have been designed to be extended this way. > On 11 Mar 2019, at 14:17, Jonas Berlin wrote: > >...

I don't know yet, Ithink there is room for a vertx util based project to host things like this too

that being said the dynamic cert options don't depend on anything

thanks @Hakky54 I think we could provide in Vert.x an SPI to integrate Vertx to more easily integrate with `SSLContext` library

do you mind providing a patch to improve the docs ? On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:41 PM donders ***@***.***> wrote: > The Vertx Core docs on the topic...

I'm not so much a fan of this as it is a free cast, i.e it prevents the user to check first the type of the object and leads to...

right, I do agree on this part, user can do it anyway... I'm wondering how changing this signature affects compatibility though.