Vassil Vassilev

> set(LLVM_PACKAGE_VERSION 2.13.2) That makes no sense. Could that be a bug in cmake? Which version of cmake do you use? Could you upgrade/downgrade and see if we can still...

That's probably a bug in our forward declaration state restore logic. @Axel-Naumann used to be taking care of these issues, generally.

If you add the includes for `o2::zdc::BCData` and other entities that this macro uses?

@hahnjo, if you look at the diff from our llvm fork you will see a bunch of work done in the area of RAII objects. That's there to be able...

Nice catch, @hahnjo! @ktf to be immune to such problems my recommendation has always been to move to C++ modules aware dictionaries on the experiments side. That means running `rootcling...

Looks like the bug is in the implementation of `cling::utils::isAddressValid` which makes a bunch of system calls iirc... I am not sure if we can do a lot here...

Maybe @hahnjo knows how to make this work...

@ktf, this looks awesome. Can you move the duplicated code in some utility function?

@phsft-bot build!

Do we have an idea of what the performance numbers are after landing this PR?