Vladimir Grichina

@MaxGraey we plan to post bounty for this on http://gitcoin.co/

> I'm just wondering what operations not implemented for `u128` yeah, I think this one is fully implemented (or very close), that's why I'm suggesting to use it as reference...

@MaxGraey can we make a bounty to get this done faster (together with division problem)? Does 3000K NEAR sound good? How long would it take? Maybe you have different estimate...

@jklp why have you created completely different commit history making it a total PITA for anyone to transfer their changes to your fork?

> as these arguments are not required because wallet will be replacing them. This is not correct. You'd then have to select account manually each time you send transaction which...

@potatodepaulo do we have specific customer who wants to integrate this? If so – I think it will help to do demo for them first and then refactor into library...

I think on client side it's relatively easy, more interesting is to create smart contract SDK which would allow to send more customised linkdrops. Like allow to avoid attaching 1...

> I think on client side it's relatively easy I mean in the sense that you just create new `KeyPair` and then make regular smart contract `functionCall` transaction to whatever...

@chadoh some of the tests do it https://github.com/near/near-api-js/blob/0e9e2c76d39ac1a3be4159a3e16a3bbc96857cf5/test/account.test.js#L71 Make sense to extract it into some utility module though to make it easy to use in any test.

> Why is the source directory src.ts? I remember asking this months ago, but forget why. No real reason, just to indicate that it's in TypeScript. > Why allow for...