Victor Gao

@wrwg @sblackshear I added a challenge section for this proposal. Feel free to add more if you spot anything something

Yeah let's probably not worry about the size of the ValueImpl right now. u256 won't make it bigger.

@davidiw Sure I'll get to this sometime. It's a lower priority compared to some other tasks though...

> Doing so would require significant changes to the borrow checker that would need to be carefully designed and implemented Yeah if we want full-fledged support for references in structs...

I wonder if this can solve our issues with `move-deps`. `move-deps` was created so that we didn't have to add the move dependencies (referred to by git hashes) everywhere, but...

@alinush yeah as we discussed offline, I'm currently busy with some urgent hotfixes... Let's try not to land this before launch. We'll get back to it later

@wrwg this is the list of gas issues/tasks I mentioned

Yeah I agree with you in principle. Been wondering if we can at least set the gas costs of move_from to 0, but still need to think a little bit...

@wrwg done. See https://github.com/aptos-labs/aptos-core/issues/5485

@movekevin please take your time! It'll take me some time to deal with test failures and resolve conflicts anyways. @wrwg these are also the main reason I'm still marking this...