Veit Schwämmle
Veit Schwämmle
Thank you for the thorough review. Below you find my comments and ticked parts. __Question__: This package comes from a tool that has a version number large than 1. How...
Thank you again for the review @jianhong I should have managed to solve all raised points with this new commit
Hi @Maux82, Thanks a lot for the help! I am running the full set of 27 runs, and I am not using the _--match_filter_ option. Does setting the filtering to...
Isn't there something wrong with the annotation of the fragmentations? For example, I can see that some files were run with ETD, ETciD and EThcD at the same time? Somehow...
Hi Patroklos, Thanks a lot for the quick and informative reply! We now understood the setup.
@matuskalas It was actually me who re-proposed the term. When annotating proteomics tools, there is almost always the option to provide information about post-translational modifications (PTMs) and this will extend...
If the requirements for a **Data** is having a **Format**, then I agree to keep it deprecated (a format might pop up at some point though). On the other hand,...
This is a tricky one. PTMs are often given as parameters and thus such might not be sufficiently relevant as is. However, most of the time PTMs are reported together...
@joncison Can you give a bit more specifics (which tabs, ...)? Or is this spreadsheet already too outdated?
Could be based on entries in bio.tools.