Valeria de Paiva
Valeria de Paiva
@fcbr I don't think it's safe. I haven't seen the emails between Claudia and Livy, but I think the issue of copula is not well-resolved in UDs and it's not...
yes, I totally agree that "que" here is only emphasis, (we'd translate as "almost totally"==> "almost that totally") and that there are many other similar expressions, using "que".
@wellington36 I believe the issue does make sense, as we can use it to discover problems, like how come there are 16 tokens with pos underscore?? what are the 117...
nao faz muito sentido pra mim nao: em "um pouco", pouco devia ser substantivo (a gente pode fazer uns muitos), 'um' det mesmo, mas a expressao toda um adverbio. e...
this is more complicated than it might appear. our linguists say we have more "auxiliary" verbs in PT than the usual "ser/estar/ter/haver" that they have in English. we need @claudiafreitas...
thanks @marcospln, it's useful to know others follow this path!
mas @leoalenc o que a gente precisa 'e de decidir quais dessas construcoes devem ser anotadas como MWEs, nao? vcs teem uma lista?
obrigada pela literatura e pela discussao da elipse. nao, eu nao tirei essa frase de la' nao, tirei das frases cuja raiz nao 'e um verbo. (estava tentando mostrar que...
sim @claudiafreitas e @livyreal eu sei que sou voto vencido nessa questao de remover frases do corpus! mas eu acho que se o proposito das UDs 'e caracterizar o portugues,...
eu concordo com Livy!