Valentin David
Valentin David
Here is the bug for netplan on LP https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1962095 However I am not sure it is totally the same situation since it is not called through subiquity.
Note that restarting the service will not work, because consolconf masks the service. You would have to unmask it. The socket unit as well.
> From [canonical/subiquity@4101440](https://github.com/canonical/subiquity/commit/41014408143ece5df9ef000d65c23f9307098905) it looks like it would actually be unmasking systemd-networkd before calling `netplan apply`. Right, I misread it.
> Can you also add a test for extra coverage for the case when the API is called through DiskFromMountPoint to make sure that the new resolver will be called...
I am making this as draft, but I am not sure this code is actually useful. We use it in 2 cases: * in snap-bootstrap to verify a disk is...
I have started https://github.com/canonical/snapd/pull/14358 as an alternative. Ping @sespiros
@zyga It works for me: ``` $ sudo systemd-mount '/tmp/lower ' --type overlay '--options=lowerdir=/tmp/lower\ ,upperdir=/tmp/upper\ ,workdir=/tmp/work\ ' /mnt/ Started unit mnt.mount for mount point: /mnt ``` Do we write the...
> What's the actual use-case for this? Can you elaborate? So far, everyone just used the kernel's variables directly, and we typically prefer that over shipping tools for this. i.e....
Also there was a hack to match the `ID_FS_UUID` on both the dm device and the data device. But that does not work for filesystems that do not have a...
> What specifically do you need this for? This is actually "thought provoking" question. Because we have multiple places where we do that, I have never questioned it. But when...