vab2048

Results 14 comments of vab2048

@GedMarc > @cowtowncoder using ASM to proxy records into the current module and avoid opens clauses adds too much overhead, I believe the constraints of strict encapsulation must be adhered...

@GedMarc Thanks for stating all these upcoming issues (and the sealed class issue). It is interesting to me as an observer and user of Jackson to see how it will...

@cowtowncoder apologies - I was running the test directly in IntelliJ 2021.3.1 (using the JUnit launcher) and it was displaying fine like so: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9255825/149835272-8ceb28da-2640-43ae-b8b2-c3a74f017dc3.png) I have now since updated the...

> The final attempt is to use a constructor and us it to construct a copy with the new Id. For Cat this works, because there is a single all...

Can confirm I had the same issue and by adding java to the path (java 11 on windows 10) it started working.

Probably doesn't help too much with the aggregate snapshot behaviour, but I posted ([here](https://discuss.axoniq.io/t/does-the-test-fixture-have-an-option-feature-to-test-serialisation-deserialisation-of-commands-events-which-it-goes-through/2996/6)) before about testing seralization/deserialization and it has worked well for me for commands/events. For completeness I'll...

If it adds any value there was a somewhat related discussion on the google groups regarding this here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/axonframework/UGe0mjUMcrA From my perspective I agree with OP that the ability to...

This issue seems to persist in 2020 - any update on how to deal with it?

Are there any known workarounds to achieve this currently? I would like to run the junit4 classes in parallel and methods in the same thread.

Thank you @benas. Are you sure that this should not be enabled by default for records (seeing as they will become a standard feature should easy-random not support them out...