unfa
unfa
Comment from Paul Davis: > We get a steady stream of reports from people (mostly on IRC) whose sessions work great as long as they do not use a CALF...
Here's a thread in Ardour bugtracker, where I've found this problem: https://mantis.ardour.org/view.php?id=8041#c23875
I agree that the spectrogram's usability suffers in favor of the aesthetics.
+1 I've realized Calf Limiter doesn't report latency, when I bounced a Master bus to a track to loop some sounds, and I've found 5 ms delay on everything -...
Hello? :) I think it'd be great if the X-over plug-ins could have a "Inertia" control like Calf Filter does - and use the same aloirthm to sweep the filters...
Thanks! Yeah, the "JACK CV" ports that Non-Mixer exposes are actually audio ports.
> To confirm; unfa, you are using this fork of non mixer? I've checked - no, I use the original version.
I'll have to test. I think I did encounter a similar issue in the past with a different plug-in. Maybe it's about a plug-in changing it's reported latency mid-playback? But...
I think this might not have anything to do with x42-dpl or latency compensation. I just got the same result attempting to automate CHOW Tape Model's Mix factor: 
Or maybe it does... because at 0% wet CHOW probably engages an internal Bypass mode...