Martin Raifer

> Any thoughts on this? Would such a PR be merged? Sure, why not! Btw. related is also #109.

Can you please reiterate what the issue with the current preset is and what exactly you are proposing to be changed? From what I read in https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/3030 the complication is...

> but also […] it was solved by returning Pier (as result) with (from) "Dock" search Yes, but I was under the impression that the two changes in https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/commit/f69714f83cc6c27a72924ab8a84f55c58b6f8d6d are...

I'm hesitating a bit, because https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:facebook is not yet marked as a deprecated tag, and there is still quite significant number of objects tagged with it. :thinking:

> Question whether fenced=yes should be deprecated at all. FWIW, `fenced` has been documented as a deprecated tag since 2016 on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fenced. If anything, this discussion should be...

For now, I go with how it is currently documented: replacing `fenced=yes` by a new `barrier=fence` object. But I would also be ok to remove that "tag upgrade rule" at...

The dashboard's code is not (yet) on github, I'm afraid. There's also no dedicated documentation, it should be pretty self-explanatory, though. What exists is the code and documentation of the...

//cc @pa5cal: can you perhaps clarify what kind of _software error_ is meant in this paragraph?

I did a quick analysis of this today. Below are the results, but note that I haven't done any double-checking on the numbers yet, so consume them with a bit...

> a contribution type OTHER the point is that contribution types of a contribution is a `Set`, so if there was a contribution type `OTHER`, it would result in basically...