Martin Raifer

> Many occurrences of `crossing=traffic_signals` `crossing:signals=yes` began as `crossing=marked`/`unmarked` `crossing:signals=yes` For reference: Looking at the data, there have only ever been 12 occurrences of features having the tag combination `crossing=traffic_signals`...

> But there’s been so much skepticism […] about the unmarked/signalized configuration One suggestion from me as a preset maintainer which you might consider: I would be much happier to...

The [proposal](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing:markings) for the `crossing:markings` tag was recently approved.

also related: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/3945 and #378

there is a preset for `highway=pedestrian` + `area=yes`: https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/blob/v3.2.2/data/presets/highway/pedestrian_area.json Other types of highways are very rarely used on areas, as far as I can see, and the wiki also doesn't...

@ManDay I appreciate your enthusiasm, but this issue is not a good place to discuss potential changes to the way the OSM tagging system. Please consider moving the discussion to...

Ok. > the issue which I filed about `highway=service; area=yes` is not at all proposing any changes to the tagging system. I think there might have been a slight misunderstanding,...

> I guess whether it should be an alias depends how exactly "alias" is defined and how it is (going) to be shown in the UI. > I'm not really...

> (FYI I consider this blocked until [ideditor/schema-builder#28](https://github.com/ideditor/schema-builder/issues/28) came to a conclusion) see https://github.com/ideditor/schema-builder/issues/28#issuecomment-1141327355 – please only keep `Track Road` and `Land Access Road` in the list of `aliases` and...

In general, I would not be opposed to add such a thing. But to be honest, right out of the box, I don't particularly like the idea of of automated...