Timo Walther
Timo Walther
Replaced by #24155.
@jeyhunkarimov First, it would be great to identify the motivation behind this ticket. Is it just because we want to be compatible with BigQuery? How many vendors support it this...
1. This is indeed a bug. I will fix it in my next iteration. Thanks for pointing it out! 2. Yes, there is more code required to make this production...
This is indeed a tricky one. I also spent a significant amount of time here. Every vendor does it differently. I looked also at programming languages such as PHP, C#....
Thanks @Sxnan. I added it for my list for tomorrow. I'm sure it can still make it before the feature freeze.
@lihaosky can we close this PR then? It is very confusing if comments are spread across PRs. And I basically have to re-review everything because my "marked as reviewed" is...
@mxm could you rebase this PR? We also observed similar issues when implementing PTFs. The field getter in RowData got fixed already. Not sure about the other changes in this...
@flinkbot run azure