Tamas Vami
Tamas Vami
Exactly :D Would be good to have an earlier measure that helps to find the optimal number before having to look at the Z distribution
this is the Z vertex with a factor of a 1000:
Here is the rest of the KS-failed distributions: [change_bias_factor_1000-ecal_pn_recon_validation_plots.pdf](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18833502/change_bias_factor_1000-ecal_pn_recon_validation_plots.pdf)
> (btw is the reference with 8 GeV/550, or 4 GeV/450?). with ref to 8 GeV/550 > Did you get around to running with old_ecal? Not yet, but sounds good
Let's test with the new gold
So a little bit more interactions in the non-W part of the ecal, but it seems the with a factor of a 1000 it's not too different. Reminder about the...
The rest of the plots that fail the KS (reminder the red is with 550 and the blue is with 1000) [bias-opt-ecal_pn_recon_validation_plots.pdf](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18898182/bias-opt-ecal_pn_recon_validation_plots.pdf)
Results in https://github.com/LDMX-Software/ldmx-sw/actions/runs/13469761175 The z with using biasing factor of 5000 Material Volume So more is happening now in the non-W based elements, I guess this was expected
I'll check now how things look like for biasing factor of 1