Nathalie Vialaneix

Thanks @dicook and @zeileis for the proposal and first assessment. My two cents: - regarding the name, I would also prefer `StaticVisualizations` (and indeed, `GraphicalModels` refers to something else for...

Hi all! I am also unsure but, as I see it, the overlap with Phylogenetics is also non negligeable (but you know the TV better than I do). In short,...

Thanks @dicook for the nice proposal! I had a quick look at it and I add a few suggestions: - for me, the difference and purpose of the sections "General...

@SimonGoring : thanks a lot for the proposal! @llrs @wibeasley @willgearty @dpprdan @maelle : thanks for the suggestions. I think that the idea is good so you can go ahead...

Dear @llrs . Considering the current discussions, which came after my initial comment, I don't want to endorse the TV yet. We have not advanced enough to a consensual position...

Thanks for the proposal. My impression is that your proposal would be a task view version of the website https://pharmaverse.org/ . Hence, at the moment, I don't clearly see its...

Thanks @mstackhouse : it clarifies a bit the proposal for me. However, looking carefully at your new proposal, I have additional remarks: - The topic organization is not clear for...

Thanks @mstackhouse : - About your remark on packages, I probably misunderstood your intent in the previous version: the current list of packages contains 23 packages and that is the...

Thank you for the proposal. I have not much to add to @zeileis 's comments. There might be a minor overlap with [Epidemiology](https://cran.r-project.org/web/views/Epidemiology.html) as well.

@ywang-gilead : Thank you for your answer and the clarification / corrections. I think that they cover most of @zeileis 's comments. Additional remarks: - Your choices for core packages...