suza
I just want to make it clear that I'm not a maintainer, so I have no saying on whether it's fine. I just wanted to point out some small errors...
I don't particularly need it to do something plugin-side, but knowing the base address ( and then knowing the offset of a certain function ) would be helpful to find...
This reminds me of this: https://github.com/nosoop/SM-TFCustAttr/issues/9#issuecomment-927907113. Same SDKHook tanking performance ( on Linux on top of that ).
Git has a submodules command that lets you "sym link" other repositories to yours, which would definitely come in handy for includes. This would require you to have git installed...
I've tested this extensively ( not that much in CWX, but rather in other cases where static attributes would get stripped ).
Yeah, I share the frustration with you. This is the only "proper" way I've found to tackle this issue without resorting to SDKCalls or DHooks. It does work, but it's...
Sorry for the late commit. I hadn't realized that you had responded until now.
The mock test is failing due to it using "any" ( however, I don't know if it's a regression or it was intentional ). If we were to change it...
No worries. I accidentally committed a wrong fix to test_sorting that I made as a test a while ago, which I've reverted. I've applied the fix to `sorting.inc`. Though, shouldn't...
Done 👍