Thomas Stastny

Thanks for the report @amandastowers and for poking @benberry3d! @sfuhrer, could you take a look please?

@howjmay, @MaEtUgR has started this process in this PR https://github.com/PX4/PX4-Autopilot/pull/19855 Maybe you could help support with testing the PR / working on the "missing items" bullets that are left?

> I think for nicer usage in all the different modules it would be helpful to extend the Sticks class to provide the common scaling and gestures (is stick below...

@sfuhrer this is a "relative" alt right? one reason the 150m may have been there before is regulations. we may want to try and switch a lot of this kind...

if we don't put a maximum for the regulation -- then would it make sense just to omit the maximum from the description? as any arbitrarily large number doesnt break...

@julianoes thanks for raising! >It would be good to flag such a mission as invalid if there is no range sensor in the preflight check. I can take a look...

Was not aware! But assumed I was not the first to look into this. Thanks for the pointer. No real rush from my side. Just put this up to get...

Yes we should do this. > closest point on the glide path and the height rate except i would recommend not "true" closest point, but rather closest point in height...

> In order to generate positive lift that means that the stadard plane models wing should have an [angle of incidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_of_incidence_(aerodynamics)) of at least 4.5 degrees. I think that is...

^blast from the past :P Though I have been dealing with this issue in the following way recently: Use OR statements in the DisplayPX4LogData function for multi-topic plots: https://github.com/ethz-asl/fw_px4_plottools/blob/0509bcbe48c695c2ce9d9b5a9d97c793af0e5b2c/01_draw_functions/DisplayPX4LogData.m#L115-L120 Then...