Taylor Salo

@mattcieslak BIDS makes the schema available as a single JSON file (https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/schema.json). I wonder if we could use that here.

Thanks @dabrielz! Agreed 100%.

Does anyone have a sense of what these plots would look like? @mattcieslak?

Ohhhh thanks @Remi-Gau! That kind of reminds me of figures from [`missingno`](https://github.com/ResidentMario/missingno), which I quite like. BTW the events file figure in the bidsgnostic documentation is _beautiful_!

@mattcieslak I like the idea of bar plots- especially if we could use something like bokeh to show the filename patterns associated with each acquisition group in a popup. @Remi-Gau...

I just checked and it's actually a separate-phase maps setup, but the IntendedFor is present in all four files.

@mattcieslak you're right. It looks like SDCFlows identifies B0Field* fmaps first, and it ignores the session entity when it does it, so having even one B0Field*-type fmap in the BIDS...

Still, given that there's this weird limitation in SDCFlows, it would definitely be useful to have a command that ensures that we use consistent field map labeling in a dataset.

Plus it would generally be a good idea to include tools to basically update BIDS datasets to use newer features. Here are a few examples: - IntendedFor --> B0Field* -...

@BaranMary sorry, but your traceback doesn't seem to be related to CuBIDS code. Could you provide a bit more detail? I also don't know what you mean by "audit script".