Timo Rößner

Check out [Contributing](https://github.com/whitesmith/rubycritic/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)

Agree, would be useful. Would somebody like to take a stab at this? ;)

The same comment I wrote for #11 applies here: > > Due to RC's nature this is not really trivial since we aggregate multiple tools and those tools have a...

One hour? Would love to see this bad boy ;) > > Alternatively it might be easier to instead slice groups of files and run each of those slices through...

Addendum: One of many reasons for this > > Keep in mind though that we will probably make Reek 283% more awesome by reading in the whole source tree with...

> > For now I just copy pasted your code into my repo and built some new features on it, but I wondered if you would be open to/interested in...

Due to RC's nature this is not really trivial since we aggregate multiple tools and those tools have a different understanding of how you can exclude and include paths. And...

No, not at the moment I'm afraid. This kind of functionality would be great though ;) What you can do right now is use special configurations for each analyzer that...

The [latest version](https://github.com/whitesmith/rubycritic/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#280--2016-02-29) of RubyCritic bundles Reek 3.11 which includes the --todo flag, so you just need to update RubyCritic and you're good to go ;)

Acknowledged. That's a pretty bad bug. Reproducibly via: ``` Ruby class Foo def bar(x,y,z); end class Wtf; end end ``` and: ``` rubycritic foo.rb ``` This will report everything on...