Thomas Roch
Thomas Roch
Having some issues with the domain, will fix ASAP
Hi @juliender, thanks for the PR. I don't feel like it is a change I can push to all users, so I would make it optional. Can you add a...
Thanks for your contribution. This seems perfectly reasonable to add this feature and I'll merge it and release it as soon as I'm finished with what I'm doing (working on...
I'm hoping to have an update soon, I've been unable to free some time due to work and family commitments.
The method will pass the active step index, is that fine? Or would prefer it to pass the step object instead?
Nope steps don't include an index as its own property. I think I need to first change how indexing works (they are not zero based, that was a stupid decision)...
OK. I might merge it at some point. I'll rework indexing to be zero based in a near future (breaking change, will bump version to 2.0.0).
Thanks for reporting, I'll look into it
v7 of router5 is out, it also has hooks, if you want to have a look.
I agree with returning an array not being a good solution. Maybe adding merge-stream or merge2 as a gulp dependency and making `gulp.merge` available?