Trevor Barnes
Trevor Barnes
I can only recreate this on sector studies right now.
Okay, for reference, CPLEX was my fault. I wasn't pulling in my licensed version, so the size was just exceeding problem limit. For future reference, since it took me FOREVER...
I wonder if this issue persists if we run the latest version of PyPSA as per [this issue](https://github.com/PyPSA/pypsa-eur/issues/1406) on PyPSA-Eur
@ktehranchi any thoughts?
I guess, maybe tangentially related, the RPS is applied to the end-use demand rather than the energy generated? I guess I understood RPS to [apply to the electricity supply](https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/renewable-sources/portfolio-standards.php) rather...
Thanks for the clarification! I think its more than just ID, WY and south east, tho. For example, in WECC, Montana has repealed RPS I believe, and PJM-GATS is missing...
Not sure how this popped up to be honest, as when doing validation runs, the emissions seemed relatively okay
This isnt really needed until distribution losses are included, or if a forced TCT constraint with technology specific parameters included for small scale batteries
Also directed to this dataset to investigate by Dimitri Saad! With the disclaimer that it is limited to the top 14 sectors in the US, and excludes cement and few...
Thanks for flagging, @WeiAi-Energy! This was done intentionally by me (and maybe a poor assumption!). I was not treating LPG as an end use fuel as I did not know...