Tobias Reiher

Not really. Both are similar, but while Componolit/RecordFlux#1215 is about adding some test data for all specifications (i.e. achieving a test coverage of > 0 %), this issue is about...

Moved to https://github.com/Componolit/RecordFlux-specifications/issues/5.

DTLS 1.3 is now published as [RFC 9147](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9147/).

Sequences with end marker are not yet supported (#61). Therefore the test case mentioned above (`Test_Parsing_IPv4_With_Options`) is currently disabled.

Moved to https://github.com/Componolit/RecordFlux-specifications/issues/6.

Moved to Componolit/RecordFlux-specifications#1.

Moved to https://github.com/Componolit/RecordFlux-specifications/issues/4.

Sounds like a bug in the validator. Could you please open a ticket for that in the RecordFlux repository? Is that also related to https://github.com/Componolit/RecordFlux/issues/833? Can we get 100 %,...

> The output is misleading here as we have the column "File", which implies the whole specification is checked. We should also look for a better solution here. This issue...

Here are some notes from Feb 14 about the specification language for sessions. I think it makes sense to collect that information here instead of leaving it on some branch....