Travis Nielsen

@lunderhage Please provide example commands where you are seeing the files are not from the local machine.

> @travisn is this ready for review or you are still exploring the fix? Thanks The fix looks good in the local testing, there just seems to be a CI...

This could be nice in general for the object store: - Rook could create a set of well-known pool names for the object store, with a prefix such as `rook-common.rgw.meta`...

Rook maintainers have regular discussions on who is taking up issues so we will discuss, just not sure on a timeline yet.

@thotz Interested in taking a look?

@BlaineEXE To follow up from [this comment](https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/10805#issuecomment-1404363274), I'm reluctant to use a CephBlockPool spec to avoid confusion between the pools used by the object store. We could make similar exceptions...

> I have concerns about that approach if the object store being referenced is deleted. What then?We don't necessarily need to use the cumbersome CephBlockPool CRs for the task. We...

We do have the design doc in progress for this feature in #12140.

> I think Rook should take the position that we only support this feature for new CephObjectStores that use namespacing. +1 for this. New object stores can have the new...

The design was defined in #12140, but I don't believe implementation is started yet.