Travis Nielsen

@nicofnt Good to hear that you were able to get it working. Want to open a PR to document this solution in the troubleshooting guide?

@thotz How are you setting the crush_location for the rgw pod? Do you need to set `host=minikube` instead of `host:minikube`?

So your goal is for the rgw pod to know which node it is running on, related to the node name in the crush map? The downward API allows setting...

Could we get away with only adding a single new test? (in the interest of avoiding too many tests in the long term) But if we can anyway remove these...

Agreed, this does look like a duplicate of #https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/12824. After reading again through that issue and also the ceph docs, I do like the proposal to add the `placementTarget` settings...

> @travisn i would be happy to implement it! Do we need further discussion of implementation details? The basic design looks ready, so feel free to start on implementation.

@BlaineEXE Thanks for the insight, now I see that it will cause confusion if we use the zone CRD to configure placements since it really is a different concept. We...

> I wasn't trying to suggest that this shouldn't be done on the zone CRD. I was trying to just say that we can't use multiple zone CRDs. > The...

> @travisn your suggestion maps better to our use-case since we are not using multisite. And it will be easier to implement when all placements managed under ObjectStore CRD. Just...

> what do you think about following workflow? How about in the design document you describe the flow in textual form (likely with a bulleted list of steps)? Then it's...