Tobias Looker

I agree with the question this issue is asking, however I'd like to drill down on what the assumption of external vs internal API means, to me it seems to...

@msporny I see this is marked as pending closed, does that mean the decision is to treat the VC API as an internal style API in the context of flows...

> Does that answer your question? Sort of, bear with me :). I still don't seem to see how an e2e flow would work in the case of say issuing...

@thehenrytsai is probably best placed to review this

> My initial take would be to extend the use of ~ to support compound issuer headers and proofs I think one thing to highlight here is that at the...

Without a proposal for holder binding done in a more opinionated way, I can see this perspective, however I do think there are simpler options so will put together something...

> This would invalidate private linking use-cases, where the holder wants to link different credentials together from multiple issuers without revealing the linkage to them, and can selectively disclose any...

+1 @andrewwhitehead exactly

> I was speaking to linking of multiple different credentials (by using the same link secret, blinded to multiple issuers). Ok great the proposal made in this issue would not...

Related to #37