Tobias Looker

Thanks, I do understand that the multi-codec identifier becomes the prefix, however I'm still not convinced with this approach. I understand that `did:key` is still forming and hence is not...

@dhh1128 to your point about SSH above, unless you are talking about putting raw public keys in the fields described which re-introduces the ambiguity we are trying to solve, you...

@SmithSamuelM I am happy to explore a more pure ephemeral did too if we deem did:key is too opinionated about its usage, what I am opposed to is creating a...

@SmithSamuelM correct in my mind with an ephemeral DID you would use a DID resolver that would just inflate the DID into a minimal DID Doc quoting one key, so...

Also creating another identifier standard is not a small undertaking, so we should approach this from the angle of why ephemeral did's do or do not fit under the did...

Still underspecified, there are economic factors that need to be considered here, wont be implemented anytime soon or be specified in the specification

Hi @flatorre1 this appears to be cause by the way we choose to structure our typings in files can you explain the usecase for this?

@tmarkovski that would be a suggested interim solution however the long term solution is a revision to the proof suite that accounts for this case in the URDNA algorithm. Given...

@vongohren as suggested by @OR13 could you create a small sample so I can debug this some more?

Thanks @brianorwhatever apologies it has taken me a few days to get to this issue, I see the cause now will start working on a fix tonight.