Tamas K. Papp
Tamas K. Papp
We just call ```julia Pkg.test(pkg; coverage = true, ...) ``` I am not aware of a way to generate coverage for dependencies, but if you know one, PRs are welcome....
Technically the 1.0 release did not go through, so I would be OK with a breaking change in the docs, especially if we can improve on accuracy in practice.
@nsajko, if you are planning to make a fix, I can wait with 1.0 (no pressure).
Due to a mistake on my part the [first attempt to register 1.0](https://github.com/JuliaRegistries/General/pull/134932) did not go through. Given the recent round of great PRs from @nsajko (#97, #99, #101, #103,...
It is on my TODO list to review and merge, it looks very nicely done so I am sure it will get merged. Apologies for the delay, this repository is...
This functionality is outside the scope of this package. It just calculates contour lines, plotting is done by other packages.
In addition to the warning above, I managed to run into an actual error when redefining a `struct`. When deleting the `{L}` from a type defined like ```julia struct Funnel{L}
I can replicate the issue with ```julia (@v1.11) pkg> st -m StaticLint Status `~/.julia/environments/v1.11/Manifest.toml` [b3cc710f] StaticLint v8.2.2 (@v1.11) pkg> st -m LanguageServer Status `~/.julia/environments/v1.11/Manifest.toml` [2b0e0bc5] LanguageServer v4.5.1 (@v1.11) pkg> st...
Thanks, looking forward to reviewing it.
Thanks, I appreciate the reminder. The code now looks good to me. I am wondering if proceeding in case of an error is always desirable. Would an argument that controls...